![]() First, let's have a look at our test sample. So the big question now is: how does the Radeon R9 270 perform compared to AMD's Radeon HD 7870? And is the newer board a good value compared to the GeForce GTX 660? We have a lot of benchmarks on the way to help answer that question. A Newegg search for "Radeon Battlefield 4" results in five hits (one Radeon R9 290 and four R9 290Xs). In addition, there is a limit of 1000 of these vouchers available. Im trying to figure out if going the extra 50 on an R9 270x, instead of a GTX 750 ti is worth it. Update: It was recently brought to our attention that AMD represented its Battlefield 4 promotion inaccurately it relies on both the participating retailer and add-in board partners to choose the models that include a game voucher. Graphics Processor GPU Name Curacao GPU Variant Curacao XT (215-0848004) Architecture GCN 1. The card's dimensions are 241 mm x 109 mm x 36 mm, and it features a dual-slot cooling solution. Picking up a Radeon R7 260X won't get you Battlefield 4, but you will get to choose two game titles from AMD's Silver tier of the company's Never Settle bundle program. Radeon R9 270X is connected to the rest of the system using a PCI-Express 3.0 x16 interface. The good news is that AMD teamed up with DICE to provide a copy of Battlefield 4 for anyone buying one of those cards starting today. AMD's Mantle API is supported, as it is with all GCN-based parts, but it remains to be seen how successful that will be.īe warned that the new Radeon R9 series (270, 270X, 280X, 290, and 290X) are not part of AMD's Never Settle bundle. You'd need a Radeon R7 260 or Radeon R9 290 series card for that. It's also worth noting that leveraging the Pitcairn/Curacao processor means the Radeon R9 270 and 270X do not support AMD's new TrueAudio feature. We already know from AMD that the Radeon HD 78 are expected to disappear soon. ![]() This was only temporary as retailers sought to clear out inventory. That also pushes the 270 below the average price of Radeon HD 7870, an offering we've seen heavily discounted over the past few months. Assuming boards really sell for $180 at launch, the Radeon R9 270 will end up $10 below the street price of a GeForce GTX 660, its main competitor from Nvidia. Just wondering what would be an nVidia GeForce equivalent to a AMD R9 270. Both the Radeon R9 270X and HD 7870 require two of those connectors.Īs for the $180 price tag, that's $20 cheaper than the recently-released Radeon R9 270X, a card with the same 1400 MHz memory clock, but a 125 MHz-higher core frequency (1050 MHz). As you can see, the Radeon R9 270 has a 150 W TDP compared to the Radeon HD 7870's 175 W ceiling. Why down-clock Pitcairn and spend more on pricier GDDR5? The only hypothesis I have is that AMD wanted the 7870's performance, while ducking under the limit of one six-pin auxiliary power connector. Based on 172,073 user benchmarks for the AMD R9 270X and the R9 280X, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 699 GPUs. The slower core frequency and faster RAM seems designed to deliver performance on par with the old Radeon HD 7870. Rather, it's essentially a Radeon HD 7870 with a 75 MHz-slower core, 200 MHz-faster GDDR5 memory, a 25 W-lower TDP, and a $180 price tag.įirst, let's consider those clock rates. I was surprised to find that the Radeon R9 270 is not an overclocked Radeon HD 7850, as I expected.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |